All noemes
Trial · NCT02586415

Noeme · ewtebnsq

Published finding — does the expert body still believe it?

The DEFUSE-3 trial's stated primary conclusion — Imaging-selected patients benefit from thrombectomy 6–16h after last-known-well. — replicates in independent cohorts.

TL;DR · AI-generated

tldr@v2.0.0
semanticscholar.org

Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke 6 to 16 hours after a patient was last known to be well plus standard medical therapy resulted in better functional outcomes than standard medical Therapy alone among patients with proximal middle‐cerebral‐artery or internal‐carotid‐arterY occlusion and a region of tissue that was ischeMIC but not yet infarcted.

Your position — does this noeme still stand given current evidence?

0% (impossible)

50%

100% (certain)

25
50
75

Proper-scoring-rule preview

If TRUE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · +8 rep
If FALSE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · -1 rep
Kelly 25.0% ≈ 250 rep

Your position is kept on this device until you sign in.

Evidence stream

2 events · 1 snapshot

posterior drift

71% → 71% (0pp · 1 point)

posterior drift: 71% → 71%
neutral

Registry data

NCT02586415

Apr 18, 2026

supports

Peer-reviewed paper

+21pp

Expert reactions · 0

Sign in to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

No reactions yet. Be the first expert to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

Source publication

Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging

Gregory W. Albers et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018

4.7k citations · S2 4.0k
163 influential
FWCI 372.8 · Landmark
OA · bronze
26 authors · 96% ORCID

· openalex W2787867590 · s2 ebb91cd3