Active replication — ongoing trial, registry, or meta-analysis.
Recent follow-up analyses of ISCHEMIA are confirming the original effect size in real-world data.
Your position — does this noeme still stand given current evidence?
0% (impossible)
50%
100% (certain)
Proper-scoring-rule preview
Your position is kept on this device until you sign in.
Evidence stream
2 events · 1 snapshot
posterior drift
71% → 71% (0pp · 1 point)
Registry data
Apr 18, 2026
Peer-reviewed paper
Apr 18, 2026
Expert reactions · 0
Sign in to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.
No reactions yet. Be the first expert to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.
Source publication
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease
David J. Maron et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020
· openalex W3014025744
Semantically related
Nearest claims in the expert-corpus vector space. Ordered by cosine distance — lower is closer.
0.0873
Recent follow-up analyses of REVASCAT are confirming the original effect size in real-world data.
0.0930
Recent follow-up analyses of ORBITA are confirming the original effect size in real-world data.
0.0999
Recent follow-up analyses of PARADIGM-HF are confirming the original effect size in real-world data.
0.1029
Recent follow-up analyses of ESCAPE are confirming the original effect size in real-world data.
0.1031
Recent follow-up analyses of EMPEROR-Reduced are confirming the original effect size in real-world data.
0.1076
Recent follow-up analyses of EARLYSTIM are confirming the original effect size in real-world data.