All noemes

Noeme · 3arqxds8

Published finding — does the expert body still believe it?

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates do not differ significantly between thrombectomy and standard care groups (6% vs 3%) in patients treated 6-24 hours after stroke onset with clinical-infarct mismatch.

Author-implied confidence

72%

Status

DRAFT

Your position — does this noeme still stand given current evidence?

Consensus 72%

0% (impossible)

50%

100% (certain)

25
50
75

Proper-scoring-rule preview

If TRUE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · +8 rep
If FALSE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · -1 rep
Kelly 25.0% ≈ 250 rep
vs. consensus: 0.16 bits

Your position is kept on this device until you sign in.

Evidence stream

1 event · 1 snapshot

posterior drift

87% → 87% (0pp · 1 point)

posterior drift: 87% → 87%
supports

Peer-reviewed paper

PMID 29129157

Apr 18, 2026

+15pp

Expert reactions · 0

Sign in to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

No reactions yet. Be the first expert to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

Source publication

Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.

5.4k citations · S2 0
FWCI 326.4 · Landmark
OA · bronze
47 authors · 81% ORCID

· openalex W2767776410 · s2 e3b1d93d

Semantically related

Nearest claims in the expert-corpus vector space. Ordered by cosine distance — lower is closer.