All noemes

Noeme · 6hdoi4xe

Published finding — does the expert body still believe it?

Intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke does not significantly increase mortality or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates compared to usual care alone.

TL;DR · AI-generated

tldr@v2.0.0
semanticscholar.org

In patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal intracranial occlusion of the anterior circulation, intraarterial treatment administered within 6 hours after stroke onset was effective and safe.

Author-implied confidence

85%

Status

DRAFT

Your position — does this noeme still stand given current evidence?

Consensus 85%

0% (impossible)

50%

100% (certain)

25
50
75

Proper-scoring-rule preview

If TRUE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · +8 rep
If FALSE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · -1 rep
Kelly 25.0% ≈ 250 rep
vs. consensus: 0.49 bits

Your position is kept on this device until you sign in.

Evidence stream

1 event · 1 snapshot

posterior drift

93% → 93% (0pp · 1 point)

posterior drift: 93% → 93%
supports

Peer-reviewed paper

PMID 25517348

Apr 18, 2026

+8pp

Expert reactions · 0

Sign in to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

No reactions yet. Be the first expert to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

Source publication

A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

6.5k citations
143 influential
FWCI 405.7 · Landmark
OA · bronze
56 authors · 63% ORCID

· openalex W2139621750 · s2 93d703fd

Semantically related

Nearest claims in the expert-corpus vector space. Ordered by cosine distance — lower is closer.