All noemes

Noeme · ayalyt0u

Published finding — does the expert body still believe it?

LCZ696 reduces all-cause mortality by 16% compared to enalapril in patients with NYHA class II–IV heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, with a hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI 0.76–0.93).

TL;DR · AI-generated

tldr@v2.0.0
semanticscholar.org

LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and of hospitalization for heart failure and decreased the symptoms and physical limitations of heart failure.

Author-implied confidence

94%

Status

DRAFT

Your position — does this noeme still stand given current evidence?

Consensus 94%

0% (impossible)

50%

100% (certain)

25
50
75

Proper-scoring-rule preview

If TRUE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · +8 rep
If FALSE: Brier 0.250 · log 0.69 · -1 rep
Kelly 25.0% ≈ 250 rep
vs. consensus: 1.07 bits

Your position is kept on this device until you sign in.

Evidence stream

1 event · 1 snapshot

posterior drift

98% → 98% (0pp · 1 point)

posterior drift: 98% → 98%
supports

Peer-reviewed paper

PMID 25176015

Apr 18, 2026

+4pp

Expert reactions · 0

Sign in to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

No reactions yet. Be the first expert to post a take, cite a related claim, or flag a methodological concern.

Source publication

Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure.

6.7k citations
372 influential
FWCI 242.6 · Landmark
OA · bronze
11 authors · 91% ORCID

· openalex W2113698123 · s2 9ca73cac